Lib·er·a·tor Blog. (Lĭb"ẽr*ā`tẽr Blŏg) n.
we love the kids. they just wanna market to 'em.


mission.   subscribe.   live.   blogs.   study.   visualart.   music.   film.   store.   advertise.   contribute.   contact.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



Monday, January 29, 2007

What is Womanism?



Black Feminism essentially argues that sexism and racism are inextricable from one another. Forms of feminism that strive to overcome sexism and class oppression but ignore or minimize race can perpetuate racism and thereby contribute to the oppression of many people, including women. Black feminists argue that the liberation of Black women entails freedom for all people, since it would require the end of racism, sexism, and class oppression.

The current incarnation of Black Feminism is a political/social movement that grew out of a sense of feelings of discontent with both the Civil Rights Movement and the Feminist Movement of the 1970s. Not only did the Civil Rights Movement primarily focus only on the oppression of black men, but many black women faced severe sexism within Civil Rights groups such as the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee. The Feminist Movement focused on the problems faced by white women. For instance, earning the power to work outside of the home was not an accomplishment for black feminists; they had been working all along.This feminist agenda ignored the fact that many women were not housewives and had been working all their lives to help support their families. In particular, African American women were already working women, but not out of choice, and not as a matter of personal fulfillment. Also, many first-wave white feminists had purposefully excluded women of color in their movement. Neither movement confronted the issues that concerned black women specifically. Because of their intersectional position, black women were being systematically disappeared by both movements. Black women began creating theory and developing a new movement which spoke to the combination of problems, sexism, racism, classism, etc., that they had been battling.

The word womanism was first used in 1863, with much the same meaning as "feminism" (source: Oxford English Dictionary). Later, it was revived by feminist author Alice Walker and became a commonly used term that indicated specifically African American feminism (also known as Black feminism). It has since reverted to a more encompassing version of feminism that crosses lines of race and class.

Walker first used the term in context in her collection of essays In Search of Our Mothers' Gardens: Womanist Prose.

Walker created the womanist movement out of these two separate movements. With the increasing use of the term, both African American Studies and Women's Studies programs began to incorporate womanism into university courses, and historians are regarded as womanist historians if they have incorporated the views and experiences of African American women in their accounts of history.

Alice Walker's Black Feminism
One of the theories that evolved out of this movement was Alice Walker's Womanism. Angela Davis was one of the first people who formed an argument centered on intersectionality; she did this in her book, "Women, Race, and Class." Kimberle Crenshaw, prominent feminist law theorist, gave the idea a name while discussing Identity Politics in her essay, "Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics and Violence Against Women of Color." Another Feminist theorist is Patricia Hill Collins; much of her work concerns the politics of black feminist thought and oppression. While many of these theorists were beginning their writing, Black Feminist groups were forming. One of these groups is The Combahee River Collective, founded by Barbara Smith; this group's primary goal was "the development of integrated analysis and practice based upon the fact that the major systems of oppression are interlocking."

In the 1980s, Dr. Clenora Hudson-Weems created the term "African Womanism" and an accompaning paradigm to describe the unique viewpoint of those women formerly referred to as Womanists.

Click here for a great list of books on womanism and black feminist identity.

Related Posts:



6 comments:

brian said...

personally i'm not really feeling the subscription to ANY kind of movement.

i think realizing and identifying the political and social issues that are important automatically will align you with the proper "movements".

what I want are the articulation of ideals and suggested "realistic" instructions on how to move closer to those goals.

often it seems like these ideological movements are so deep and intertwined that they turn into "in-fighting" arguments that people who are not familiar with can't comprehend or relate to.

j9 said...

a movement is any group of like minded people who are coming together to work towards change.
a movement can be anything. If your fighting against racism your apart of a movement.

conversations only turn into arguments with close minded people.
truly progressive movements and people all have common goals.
so it hasnt been a problem in my experience.

some people are open minded and willing to learn about the experiences and realities of people who's lives are different and probably challenging to their own way of life. Some people arent.
some white people are open to understanding white privilege, some are not. Its understandable it means completely changing the way they function and interact with the world. Thats not easy, but thats also not an excuse to be ignorant
in the same way some men are open to understanding patriarchy and some are not.
its the same exact thing

brian said...

i don't disagree with you.

im saying the "subscription" to these titles is what i see little need for.

in fact i think it often does more harm than good.

on one end some people get caught up in the title, thinking it is what will define them.

on the other hand people get caught up on the titles feeling that it excludes them.

to me it's more along the lines of religion. i feel no need to state to anyone what "team" i'm on.

i think it only serves to misguide me, and to isolate others.

instead i strive to define myself by what it means to be a great human being. and like you said, i'll fall into all the right movements just by being serious about doing that.

so my problem isn't with all the work that has gone into critiquing patriarchal society, rather the coining of titles that supposedly identify those who do that.

Anonymous said...

J9 & Brian are either of you familiar with the works of Clenora Hudson-Weems, Womanist theory and Nah Dove's, African Womanist theory? Both of these scholars decry the term "feminist or black feminist" being applied to African women. I think sometimes African people attempt to apply the models and theories of people from different cultures, lifestyles and experiences, and apply them to ourselves even when they are not applicable.

Did not feminism arise out of the oppression of European women by European men? While African/Black women have always been oppressed by White men, we've also been further oppressed by white women. So why would we feel the need to be a part of their story when our own story is so vastly different?
Must we tell our story within the confines of someone else's? I think getting caught up in the theories, models and worldviews of humans with different life experiences is not conducive to our own sovereignty and thus causes the continuation of our invisibility as a part of the human family.

brian said...

never heard of her (Clenora Hudson-Weems)

i think what you're saying about her supports what i feel about these ideological groupings... that they can become these arguments that are mostly in-fighting and that few people outside of them even understand, let alone care about.

what are your key issues, principles? what are your key strategies?

that's really what i care about. even with pan-africanism, etc... i care less what someone calls THEMSELVES... true servants get their titles from others. they are more concerned with manifesting principles of proper human living. I think Jesus would never concern himself with whether or not it was appropriate to call him a Christian.

j9 said...

Anonymous,

I would be very interested in reading those ladies, I'll look them up.

Womanism grew out of discontent with the Feminist movement and the Civil Rights Movement. 1st wave womanist writers and thinkers spent most of their time deconstructing mainstream feminism and how it not only oppresses but doesnt address the needs of poor women and women of color. I dont know if youve ever read Black feminist theory or not, but what I have read has been very eye opening for me in terms of the struggle for black female equality.
I understand what you are saying about the roots of feminism, thankfully 2nd wave black feminism has tended to move past obsessing over white women and focused more on ourselves and our solidarity with third world/global south women all over the world. Thats what I'm personally interested in, mental decolonization and creating solidarity internationally.

I think that all women around the world have interconnected oppressions, and that those similarities can build bridges between us. I see more in common with global women than I see differences, no matter what economic class or color. White women and women of color in America have a lot to work on as far as understanding (mostly white women need to step out of there little boxes) but I also do think that we have somewhat of a common ground to build on. But like I said I'm not going to spend my time or energy concerned about white women.

The only thing I can say to you is that if you can read, Patricia Hill Collins "Black Feminist Thought" and not get some level of comfort and acknowledgement of your struggle out of that text, then our struggles as black women are not the same. Its all good if thats the case, everyone is different.

Post a Comment