Lib·er·a·tor Blog. (Lĭb"ẽr*ā`tẽr Blŏg) n.
we love the kids. they just wanna market to 'em.


mission.   magazine.   live.   blogs.   study.   visualart.   music.   film.   store.   advertise.   contribute.   contact.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



Friday, May 09, 2008

Promises, expectations, discipline, love, lust + trust



[First: some interesting articles on Wikipedia. Psychology of Monogamy. Forms of Nonmonogamy. Now...]

Sister Toldja has a pledge for women everywhere. She proposes that all women take this pledge:

I, (your name), will not knowingly engage in inappropriate physical contact with another woman's man. As I want to have a man of my own who I can trust with my heart, I will not help to deny another woman the right to have that. Furthermore, I will encourage any man who tries to solicit me for such activities to reconsider either his desire to cheat or his place in the relationship all together. I will NOT be "the other woman".

After reading the entire post, I realized I have so much that I feel about relationships that thinking of responding was exhausting. That alone discouraged me from even saying anything in response. But of course I couldn't work with that feeling lingering so hence this post.

First lemme say I trust Toldja enough to feel she is coming from the right place, but since I don't know the sisters chiming in I have no idea if they are co-singing sensationally like how people be obsessed with Obama but are too lazy to actually be pro-actively political... or if they are really co-signing from a place of genuine understanding of what Toldja is trying to get at with the pledge.

What it comes down to is that I wish men and women could talk more openly in person and in collective spaces -- not a brother confiding in private to his "3 best-friend-sisters that he ain't even attracted to" -- about sex, sex drives, lust, love, monogamy, and more.

I’m a connecting type of person. I connect dots wherever I find them cause I believe in the oneness of things in this universe we live in (I know the actual word “universe” has become cliché lately, but stay with me).

So I can't talk about women making pledges not to sleep with other women's men without talking about why women are doing that in the first place. And I can't talk about that without talking about why men are stepping out on their women.

I guess part of my concern is that I feel this sentence in the pledge -- "As I want to have a man of my own who I can trust with my heart, I will not help to deny another woman the right to have that" -- is a little vague. It has the potential to be turned into something romantic and needs to be further critiqued (so says me, lol). Well here are some of my thoughts:

Toldja’s post focused on women who knowingly have sex with another woman’s man and it touched a little bit on relationship men who cheat. I’m interested in why women (or men) knowingly have sex with another person’s mate. I’m also interested in why people who are in relationship cheat. Maybe it’s “liberal” of me, but I feel like understanding these issues that cause so much hurt and confusion is a better investment of energy than taking a pledge minus that understanding. I believe this because I’m skeptical of all humans. Not that I think we are evil, rather that I think we are naturally only fallible. Because I believe this I’m less concerned about perfecting humans and more concerned about humans communicating and understanding each other so that when we fail each other (something I see as a given) we understand why and that understanding helps us heal faster and prevents relationships from breaking down due to our human failures.

Along the lines of the categories that I observed in Toldja’s post, I’m going to try to keep my musing in categories as much as possible for the sake of progress. Without definition, these conversations are worthless and only create more misunderstanding. And I despise that, as I think it is the number one thing keeping us disorganized and in mental slavery (I know that’s a cliché too but as Danielle said, so is everything now days). I’ll start with the categories that I observed in Toldja’s post and I’ll transition into categories that her post led me to think of:

[2 Categories] People who have knowingly had sex with another person’s mate:
Single women who have knowingly had sex with another woman's man.
I do know some of these women. And to be honest, none of them are black women, save for the ones I see in music videos and on talk shows. I think what drew the women I know to do this was that they were more susceptible to loneliness and isolation than the men I know. So when a handsome, comforting, friendly brother comes along they were willing to give into those urges. The women I know are also not as egotistical and territorial as men in a situation where its not her territory at stake, so the combination of loneliness and lack of ego holding her back is a recipe for this situation. With black women I think it’s different. At first I was going to say that for black women, respect for the man’s woman tends to trump their desire or loneliness. But that ain’t necessarily true. I think this gets to what Toldja’s pledge is about. Many black women I think are already insecure about relationships and their chances of long term partnership with someone. And so they discipline themselves not to knowingly get with another woman’s man really out of a karma-like self-interest rather than a true respect for the other woman. In other words I fear most women taking Toldja’s pledge are doing so because they don’t want something coming back on them, rather than cultivating a true respect for other women. While it may be a way to get people on the right track initially (something I’ve accepted as necessary), long term this is a recipe for failure. I don’t think this is a sustainable way to cultivate organization and harmony between people. At some point we have to go deeper than being motivated to do good out of fear and insecurity. But it’s a start.

Single men who have knowingly had sex with another man's woman.
Firstly I have to say I don’t know any men who knowingly have had sex with another man’s woman, I’ve only heard about them in music videos and talk shows. A woman in a relationship stepping to a man is unheard of in my experience. Then again, women stepping to men period seems like a rarity nowadays. But say a woman who is in a relationship does step to a man I think what keeps most men from not sleeping with another man’s woman has more to do with his masculine ego more than his respect for the other man, given that he doesn’t even know the woman’s man. He simply doesn’t want a woman who is paired with another man. It’s a territory thing, I believe. And even then, it’s less about him respecting another man’s “territory” than it is about his ego not being attracted to “territory” that already “belongs” to someone else. Not to say that men don’t a motivation to respect other men, but it’s more about the ego than that respect. So loneliness doesn’t trump ego for most adult men. But in terms of what prevents most men from doing this, respect may be a factor but it doesn’t trump ego as the primary restrictor.

[2 Categories] Relationship people who have sex outside their relationship:
In talking with a lot of people lately about sex and monogamy, I’ve come to realize that cheating is not all the same to many people. Now I’m fully aware that this goes against many people’s viewpoints. But regardless of your viewpoint, if there is a viewpoint other than yours then your viewpoint is by default forced to coexist with those other viewpoints regardless of how you feel about it. Their mere existence dictates this. Therefore, cheating or having sex outside of one’s relationship can be broken down into four categories in my view. But first, these are some general thoughts on monogamy, loyalty, love and trust:

Can a man cheat on his women and still love her? Yes. Can a man cheat on his woman and not hurt that woman? Highly unlikely. So, for men I believe the reason cheating is not the enemy of love is because they can cheat and still love their woman strongly.

As I've matured, love has come to have less to do with infatuation, butterflies, tingly feelings, and romance, and much more to do with friendship and understanding. If my woman is attractive to me (physical attraction I’ve learned, while not fully, is partially in the eye of the beholder), a true friend of mine and I feel that she understands me and is down to support my passions in life and is down to talk, is open-minded, creative, loving (meaning non-judgmental) and is passionate about something herself then I can love her forever.

Yet despite that, I believe a man is still going to be attracted to other women, Men are even able to have sex with another woman knowing they have all of those qualities at home and not feel they have betrayed their love for that women. I’ve seen it with many of the elder men in my life.

But whether or not they have betrayed their woman's trust is another issue. Trust is built on expectation. So if a woman has communicated that she expects monogamy and a man cheats he has broken her trust. There are women however who do not expect monogamy and thus a man can have sex with another woman and not break the trust of his relationship. What I'm getting at is that relationships need to be customized.

I'm not a cheerleader for polygamy, but the women who are most refreshing to me are those who are open to critically discussing the psychology of western "romance" and monogamy. In other words, if this conversation bother you, then you bother me.

So all that to say, I'm with the pledge if it's really about the pledge, as I trust for Sista Toldja it is. But to the co-signers, just make sure u ask yourself that and answer honestly. Make sure the pledge ain't about promoting or proselytizing your feelings and views on monogamy. And make sure that you are moving past pledging simply because you are scared of karma and are insecure about your chances of having love.

When I was a child I disciplined myself out of fear. I avoided sin because I was scared of hell. It was unsustainable. When I failed I was hurtful and hateful to myself. When others “failed me”, I was bitter and full of disappointment, constantly disillusioned and jaded. I've also tried disciplining myself not for the sake of seeking harmony with myself but for the sake of teaching someone else a lesson... of "showing" someone "this is how it's done". I was being very passive aggressive though and I used it as a substitute for truly understanding and engaging people. I learned no one wants to feel passive aggressive energy, it reeks of arrogance. Education is useless without community and community is impossible without humility. Therefore education is useless without humility.

The greater education, and dare I say "retraining", of ourselves must involve understanding each other, having compassion for oneanother's issues and bullshit and loving oneanother because of all of that, not always "despite" that. And certainly we must never make comfort a prerequisite of love. I'm not saying we ought to embrace women who cheat with other women's men, or embrace men who lust for other women while in a relationship, but damn, this shit been going on for so long. Don’t we eventually have to ask why it keeps happening? Do we even understand what and who we are so mad at? Are we content with constantly being disappointed?

As I mentioned earlier, I’ve learned that having sex outside of a relationship happens for different reasons, and happens in different ways, with different motivations and different consequences. There are four different categories that I can think of:

Relationship men who’ve sparsely had sex outside their relationship.
Some women expect monogamy. But some do not. And often times I feel women who expect monogamy are insecure about the women who don't expect it. Hence things like this pledge. I'm not so sure some lighting bolt of Karma will strike a woman who does not expect monogamy in the first place. So if a woman takes the pledge only to ensure herself good karma or only to be an example to other women she’s not guaranteeing herself much.

Some women may expect love, but she may also feel that love is not monogamy. And not being monogamous is not equal to being a player or a pimp.

For some men the expectation of monogamy being lifted actually causes monogamy. For some of these men they will be monogamous for the rest of their lives, for other men they will step out on their woman just one or a few times. But even if that happens one or a few times I do not think the lifting of the expectation of monogamy was done in vain because a man who steps out on his woman but knows his woman does not have the expectation of monogamy hovering over his head knows that his relationship is not in danger of being destroyed, his woman knows this as well. Monogamy is not synonymous for trust to all people. She may find out about the incident and be upset, but at least they know that because their relationship is not based on the expectation of monogamy that it can weather a storm, or sparse storms, of lust.

Relationship men who regularly have sex outside their relationship.
Admittedly, for other men the expectation of monogamy being lifted is a cue to abuse their woman and be players or pimps. I find that the psychology of this man is vastly different than that of a man who merely wants the expectation of monogamy lifted from over his head for the sake of a stronger and more honest relationship.

Relationship men who’ve never had sex outside their relationship due to a lack of desire.
Only when I was a young boy did I encounter other young boys, religious fanatics, and ghetto philosophers who made this claim. And in retrospect I can tell it was mostly because they were young practitioners of a religion that professed this as sin and so they claimed a lack of desire because they feared judgment -- either from God or from other believers. I know no adult males who make this claim. If you find one, let me know.

Relationship men who’ve never had sex outside their relationship due to discipline.
Quite possible to find, but for how long? This is a person who claims to be at peace with resisting certain urges. My experience with this was that I tried… and failed. And I hated how I felt after I failed. I beat myself up. But say others have succeeded… I wonder, because we are all human, where those urges manifest themselves elsewhere in this person’s life? They say no one is free from “sin” and everyone has a vice. Do they discipline themselves here and sacrifice discipline elsewhere?

Dating:
Dating people who’ve had sex with a friend of a person who they either are dating or have dated.
I’ve done this before. This is bad just because it’s too close for comfort. You end up shitting where you sleep which is no good.

On the other hand is the betrayal of friendship by the friend. Why would the friend do that to her friend? Most likely for the same reasons why they’d do it to a person they don’t know.

People who’ve had sex with a friend’s mate or date.
My friends tend to have a “law” against this, unless in some circles I guess where they might make an agreement that this is okay. Swingers? That law though makes me think that the gist of Toldja’s pledge is a good thing. Men get together and discuss the laws of brotherhood when it comes to dealing with women. Women ought to do the same thing. Communication is vital in a society like ours that has so many cultures that there is no culture. Friends definitely need to communicate with each other who is dating who and not assume. There ought to be discussions between friends that establish clear laws of brotherhood and sisterhood. I find with my brothers, we assume nothing. There’s been a point in all of my close male friendships where we’ve discussed this, rather than assuming and possibly being disappointed later on.

Related Posts:



3 comments:

kamille said...

*Disclaimer* The following comments may, at times, sound very crass, but I happen to be the sounding board for many of my friends, both male and female, so I'm just calling it like how I see/have seen it. I am also, by no means, claiming to speak for all women as many have a totally different set of circumstances based on upbringing, value systems, religion, worldviews and morals that would lead them to see things and act differently in most situations. I'm simply sharing my thoughts on the subject as posted, so of course, there are going to be MANY generalizations. Hopefully you can trust that I MEAN WELL and I'm simply trying to communicate my points and express myself to the best of my ability; plus build on points that achali already made.

Here are my general thoughts on love, trust, loyalty and monogamy, because I want to lay some foundation:

I happen to have a very different take on relationships as well. It's an aggregation of observances, experiences and both introspective and communal thought. I've always wondered how I arrived at this mindset, and I can trace it way back to when I was a youngun, and I had a "boyfriend." We weren't physically involved but he had been with a couple of girls before I hooked up with him, and I really wasn't trying to go there at the time.

One day, I was like "you know ... I know that that's something that you like to do ... but you know that I'm not going there, so if you're trying to get fulfilled that way, from somewhere else, by all means, go ahead. I promise, I won't care." I know ladies, stone me. Needless to say he looked at me like I was crazy, and he indulged in my offer a couple of times, that I know about. But eventually I think his desire to just build our relationship outweighed all that and we grew to the point that we just wanted to be monogamous anyway (the pimp in him got put to sleep lol). And honestly it wouldn't have made a difference either way. I had a firm grasp on what I knew he felt for me. I was secure in the extent of that. I knew right where we were at. I knew he had mad love for me. I was chillin! I didn't have that expectation. Perhaps I was crazy or didn't have any "self-respect," as many of my girlfriends said of me ... but i can say that it laid the foundation for how i think about relationships now. Ole boy and I were together for a LONG time and are great friends to this day.

I've also had relationships where I expected monogamy, knowing in the back of my mind, that exclusivity in and of itself wasn't what i really wanted ... it was simply honesty, friendship, laughter and companionship, no matter what form it came in. Pretty much my only expectation, or preference rather, is that the times when you're with me, you're with me and making me feel like I'm the only one in your world. And then when we part ways, we part ways. Holler.

So I agree that relationships have to be customized. I'd add that most times, what we want and need can be achieved outside of the scope of the word "relationship," but I see that achali is trying to construct this understanding within a relationship environment. These days, I know that I am attracted to a lot of different things in a lot of different people, so in order to save souls, I refrain from being in "relationships" with people so that they won't be "subjected" to my very fluid world view. I will concede that the state of health relations these days has also complicated things (STDs, airborne ish, skin eating diseases), such that I'm paranoid that you're trying to take me out of this life if you're even BREATHING on me ... so let's just say that I keep my distance, for the most part, and live vicariously through my friends and family, until I'm ready to officially turn theory into practice.

Now on to the categories. (I'm trying to stick to your format, achali.)

People who have knowingly had sex with another person’s mate:
Single women who have knowingly had sex with another woman's man.


First, I want to build on your rundown of why women do this. I know plenty in real life of all colors, types and motivations: bad-minded, well-meaning, insecure, indifferent, spiteful, horny, inebriated, lonely, ambitious, whatever. In general, being a" homewrecker" is looked down upon in sister circles so on the surface, many want to try (at least publicly) and avoid being labeled as such. I say publicly because I don't think it would be such an issue if no one else knew. That's why a lot of times, girls sometimes withhold this information even from their sisterfriends for fear of judgment. The only time they might tell is if they think the guy might "really love her" and then it's relayed as just a tragic thing where they are "really supposed to be together but he's just 'stuck' in a relationship with this girl he really doesn't want to be with anyway and one day he'll see the light." And then the whole respect/sisterhood solidarity factor is out the door. sister friends might even start encouraging her: 'go get your man, girl!'

I think, in general, we have a long way to go before we get to the respect (minus) fear of karma and insecurity formula. But I don't think that it's a static state. I think respect has a large 'empathy' component where you at some point in time have to be able (and willing) to put yourself in the other person's shoes, which is why i don't necessarily mind it as a starting point for the pledge.

Oh yes, there's also the situation where a girl might be knowingly sleeping with another woman's man because she is just trying to have a "no strings attached" arrangement where she is simply getting her sexual needs met and it's easier when the man has a woman, so she doesn't have to worry about him trying to cuff her or wife her (<-- yes, there are some women who aren't trying to be "wifed" at every waking moment. lol). So she rationalizes in her head that she's just getting her needs met, and meeting his simultaneously. She has no expectations of anything long term or serious coming out of it, therefore she doesn't really see herself as being a "homewrecker" or "denying the other woman's right to happiness." She doesn't even put herself into that equation.

A lot of times however, her perceived "detachment" is appealing to the man (who can't calculate in his mind why a woman wouldn't want him, ALL of him) and he ends up liking her more and that's where the trouble starts. Beware of lust manifested. So those are a just a couple more combinations. Why women don't do this, is largely a result of peer influence, fear of karma (like you say), and a general desire NOT to actively aid and abet the destruction of a family unit. Increasingly, as we continue to have these conversations, and reform behaviors in other arenas (like in our day to day interactions in the workplace, at school or just out on the street) the restraint will be out of respect.

Single men who have knowingly had sex with another man's woman.
I know plenty in real life of all colors, types and motivations. The primary motivation I've seen is that they want a no-strings attached arrangement as well. Quite contrary to your observations though, I've seen it being played out as an actual assertion of a man's perceived limitless territories ('eff yo man. He ain't here is he?' or 'what's your man got to do with me?' or my favorite, "will your man be mad if i called you?" ahahaha). Personally, I've witnessed men -- good brothas included -- at least TRY to push the boundaries. And then when you get all Mint Condition on them, you're like "nawh man, I got a man and you know that ain't right, what kind of woman would i be? *giggle, giggle, giggle*" THEN they're like, "I respect that ma, wish I had a woman who was down for me like that, tell him he's a lucky man, he better be treating you right ... blah, blah, blah." Okay, I'm getting WAY too technical, but it's for the purposes of demonstration. I'm saying the respect sometimes is a PROCESS. Much like in the woman's situation, where the respect comes as a derivative of empathy -- putting yourself in the other woman's shoes. I think you're on point about why they don't though.

Relationship people who have sex outside their relationship:

achali: Can a man cheat on his women and still love her? Yes. Can a man cheat on his woman and not hurt that woman? Highly unlikely. So, for men I believe the reason cheating is not the enemy of love is because they can cheat and still love their woman strongly.

I think that this is the line of demarcation, because women in a relationship see and utilize sex differently. Can a woman cheat on her man and still love him? Absolutely. Can a woman cheat on her man and not hurt that man? Highly unlikely, because that's like the ultimate assault on his manhood -- and we know it. Which leads me to my next point. If she actually does step outside of the relationship for SEX, you can pretty much consider yourself a goner. ESPECIALLY if that outside "experience" was ... ahem ... pleasing to her.

Allow me to explain.

You'll rarely find a situation with women who step out for sex even though she's getting 'everything' fulfilled at home. Because unlike a man who is getting fulfilled at home yet still steps out, a woman will NOT step out for SEX if she is getting fulfilled at home. A woman is far more literal and direct. A woman will step out for sex if she is not getting fulfilled sexually at home. And the point where she determines that she is not being fulfilled sexually at home comes AFTER she has determined in her mind that she is also not being fulfilled emotionally and intellectually and spiritually, etc. and has endured those things without stepping out. Since emotional, intellectual and spiritual fulfillment and sexual fulfillment are inextricably intertwined with most women, you can see her sexual stepping out as a testament to her emotional, intellectual and spiritual death in relation to you.

Sounds harsh, but at least you can see why so many girls trip when the man does this if there was an expectation of monogamy. Because we mistakenly think that we think the same way and apply the same value to sex, when we really don't. This needs to be discussed and hashed out. I think single men and single women have similar views on sex. But somehow, it changes for women once they're in a relationship.

Anyway, in my experience, I have YET to see a relationship continue to work long term where the woman stepped out. For one reason, in comparison to women, men are FAR LESS forgiving of an adulterous woman in most cases (because of bruised egos and fear of inadequacies). Go figure?! And two because the woman has probably rendered the relationship over prior to stepping out. Actually articulating the break up is just the formality. Thus, she probably doesn't even consider herself cheating ("girl, we were over and done with about 6 months ago ..."). So how do we reconcile these two viewpoints?

Anyway, that's all I could muster up for right now ...

ElectricLadyLike said...

wow...this discussion is CRUCIAL!
Yup...much respect to Achali and Kamille for all that you've expressed...
okay so here's what I'm thinking (and based on the abstract-Gemini-ness that I got going on, imma be listing!)

1. I think monogamy is an ideal to be aspired to (as is LOVE, RESPECT, etc). It is an action that really comes to fruition when practiced (atively...ehem..."I do" just ain't gonna DO IT!). So I think it requires a willingness to submit to it, for it is human nature to want variety (or even to fall victim to the fear of missing out). I think that the willingness to submit to monogamy (or the fear of doing so) manifests itself VERY differently for men and women. Women are usually groomed to be monogamous. It is our duty to "catch" a man and by GOD to "keep" him...by any MEANS necessary. THe failure to do so is CLEARLY indicative of our less-than-womanliness! (sarcastic but still true). Men tend to view monogamy as something they'll "get around to" and only when they're "married" or have "sown their wild oats/whole grains/whole foods/fresh-damn-fields"! lmao!
But they tend to move into grudgingly (as adults anyway, younger men tend to be all wide-eyed about love and MAD open...that is until they wife the skanky chic and then its pretty much over for them). Most adult men I know tend to look at monogamy as something that requires them to GIVE up all the potential women they could have (even though in reality, they're not getting close to 99% of these women). ITs just the IDEA that they're out there. More than that though, there is this male THING (what it IS I don't know) that SCREAMS for NEW _____! I've heard different men explain it different ways, but there's this thing about NEW and DIFFERENT that makes even the most loving and devoted man start itching for a new woman in their life. Even if its only a one-time situation. That's something that I feel needs to be addressed if we're ever going to move towards true monogamy. It will only remain an ideal if we don't address those urges (as Achali mentioned).

2. I feel that women and men have different expectations when it comes to LOVE and SEX. From what I've seen (and with Kamille's disclaimer in mind: because I can't speak for all), a lot of women want to be loved. Period. And if they feel loved, if they feel like their man is into them, loving them and appreciating them, they're less likely to feel insecure, to go snooping around "looking for stuff" or even to fathom the notion that he might actually be cheating. And sadly, some of these women refuse to take a step back and access their situations and accept the fact that he just might be cheating, for they are so smitten and so in love with the idea of being in love.
And THIS might seem a it backward but I think that that actually keeps the damn peace! Seriously. If what I know won't hurt me then make sure I don't EFFIN know!
Of course knowing encompasses me finding out because my dude told me, someone else told me, the side-heifer told me, I caught you, I've contracted an alphabetic disorder (any S.T.D.), etc. Problem is too many men slip up and then all hell breaks loose. But a lot of WOMEN might not be as worried or obsessed with men cheating if they didn't KNOW about it!
Too many men make it obvious and then it becomes a respect thing (like how DARE you throw that in my face, make me feel like I'm second or worthless or whatever).

3. I agree that on the FLIP men cannot handle the idea of a woman cheating on them! Some men can't even think about their ex-girlfriend dating someone new. Evn that is too much to bear. I think that's where the traditional roles come into play. Most men are groomed to be possesive and territorial when it comes to women. Women are the same way, but its almost a known fact that a woman will have to deal with her man stepping out at some point in her life. We're groomed for that too. And prepared to scrap over it too! yup!

4. Where I'm at with it?
Well...
I've come to realize that as Prince said it (and Bonnie Rait too but Prince SANG that ish) "I cant make you love me, if you don't!" Thats a HARD lesson to learn, but it MUST be done! lol!
I think some folks roll through their existence on some "I HAVE to be in a relationship" without searching for compatibility, a TRUE mate if you will. I'm SO over that!
Plus, I'm starting to realize that you have to GO through things with people. You can't just walk away because they did something you don't like, they're not your MIRROR image, etc.
That's the part of a relationship that people don't always elaborate on, but really makes a difference. Is a person being JUST like you most important? Or is coexisting with someone who has a different way of doing things but who also balances you the biggest testament to true love?
I'm thinking a little bit of both.
Compromise...oh, Compromise!
Humanity's greatest challenge but still an ideal that we should work towards.

achali said...

"the woman has probably rendered the relationship over prior to stepping out. Actually articulating the break up is just the formality. Thus, she probably doesn't even consider herself cheating...how do we reconcile these two viewpoints?"

i guess i lean towards a non-reconciliation here...

at THIS point in my growth, i personally see my role as a man to provide a woman/women with those spiritual/emotional/physical needs of hers.

my point of challenge i guess in customizing my ideal relationship, would be to come to understanding that i am capable of fulfilling those needs without the expectation of monogamy.

and that does not mean that i want new women right now... but it means that i want our relationship to be based on me meeting your needs, not on some mental romantic construct.

on the flip side of the non-reconciliation, is me opening up the floor to criticism and making sure this woman (who Kamille is saying probably doesn't want to cheat if she's getting fulfilled) is voicing any and every dissatisfaction that occurs where her needs are not being met and that i step up and meet them or am invested enough to help make sure they are fulfilled rather then leaving her to fulfill them herself. and of course this fulfilling expectations must be in the bounds of what a secondary person can reasonable do for someone else. of course i am assuming a level of passion, self-motivation and independence to enable her to fulfill herself regardless of her relationship status.

Post a Comment