The Rise and Inevitable Liberation of the Black Creative Class



{liberatormagazine.com exclusive feature}

The Rise and Inevitable Liberation of the Black Creative Class
by Robert Bland (Intern, The Liberator Magazine)

Urban Studies theorist Richard Florida makes a living writing about a group of individuals called the “creative class.” While some of our great American cities have seen precipitous declines in this postindustrial, Florida argues that our country’s still relevant cities have one thing in common—hipsters. If only Detroit, Baltimore and Cleveland could have sold hipsters on the luxury of being in the rustbelt, they too could be like Seattle. Or, even better—Brooklyn.

Ok, Maybe not. But it appears that in our intensely hipster-aware popular culture, the idea of a creative class does have some resonance. Despite most of the creative class focus being centered around a white upper-middle class experience, I think there is sufficient evidence to say that over the last ten years we have witnessed over the rise of a sort a “black creative class.”

While not quite a fully cohesive group, the black creative class does share some similar traits. Because most of the group has been to college, and a considerable amount grew up in the suburbs, the black creative class fits somewhat neatly into the American definition of middle-class. After school, they generally migrate to a large city where a critical mass of other black creatives can be found. They are weary of essentializing conceptions of race but also discount the idea that we are living in a “post-racial” America. While most do not enter the arts or the entertainment industry directly, popular culture is the lingua franca of the black creative class. If you post an article that is critical of Tyler Perry on your Facebook wall, one of your black creative class friends will probably “like” it (if they did not already post it themselves). If you are not sure if you are talking to a black creative see if they respond positively to any of the following: Stringer Bell, Erykah Badu’s “Evolving” tattoo, The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao, Hillman College, She’s Gotta Have It, early nineties black fashion, J*Davey, or Jean-Michel Basquiat (patron saint of black creatives).

After spending tens of minutes doing copious field research, here are some of my initial findings on what makes the black creative class tic:

1) Our revolution was televised

I am hesitant to give undue influence to television changes in our culture but for the black creative class, you cannot get around the fact that we grew up in the golden age of black television. In our childhood years, there was always a wholesome representation of the black middle class on TV. From The Cosby Show and A Different World to The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air and Living Single, we consistently saw black families, black education, and black working professionals in prime time. Of course, these shows were being aired at a moment when the black middle class was increasing but, as a cultural backdrop, I think having these trends reinforced on a weekly basis has been critical for how the black creative class sees the world.



Conversely, our adolescence and young adult years have been spent watching, debating (or avoiding) another televised force: Black Entertainment Television. As the golden age of black television waned in the late nineties, BET became a larger figure in our cultural imagination and served as the primary provider of images for black folks in our popular culture. Subsequently, 200 years of African-American progress was lost and Frederick Douglass wept with the ancestors in heaven.

2) Kanye West is our spirit animal

While the black creative class has some overlap with hip-hop, we were not actively consuming the culture’s musical productions during its golden era (1986-1994). It was not until the shiny suit era that the burgeoning black creative class engaged in the culture at a critical level; even here, we are walking into a preexisting culture war, with listeners being forced to align with either the substance-free mainstream or the self-seriously grim underground. That is until Kanye showed up.



While the underground vs. mainstream divide was always a bit contrived, Kanye was the first individual from the black creative class to really suggest that there was another way to frame hip-hop music. With his debut album The College Dropout, Kanye eschewed dense slang and ornate wordplay for a rap style that was stripped down, if not conversational. Against the backdrop of looped soul samples that would please the fiercest golden-era acolytes, Kanye waxed eloquently on themes that black creative class’ own struggles: college, relationships, family, religion, and balancing materialism with peace of mind.

Many in the black creative class encountered his music at some point in college and the meteoric rise of Kanye is in some ways a reflection of their own transition into adulthood. His catalogue mirrors their own desire to enjoy the good life of the American dream while still being keenly aware of how limiting the more material sides of the dream can be.

3) We are painfully middle class but struggle with elitism

A lot has been written about class in America in the aftermath of the 2008 market crash. While millions of Americans have lost equity in the recent financial collapse, the effects of recession have been especially pronounced on the gains black Americans have made in the post-civil rights era. Looking at just wealth, the national average in the black community has dropped from $5,000 in 2007 to $2100 in 2010. In comparison, the amount of wealth in the average white household in 2007 was $100,000.

I point to this data to show the tension between being culturally middle-class and economically middle-class. As a group, the black creative class is more college educated and more cosmopolitan than any group of black folks in our country’s history. In this very unique historical moment, the black creative class seems more ready to push forward on the civil rights dream that our parents and grandparents fought so valiantly to make a reality. But, as a group, we are also painfully unsure about where to go next.

This tension can be most readily seen in the ambivalence the black creative class has towards figures like Tyler Perry. Where there will always be space in our culture for folks to produce art that is accessible, if not downright reductive, the black creative class defines itself in opposition to these movements. We want to be in alliance with, if not a part of, a cultural elite that imagines a world that could be. In some ways, this is a vital gesture. The most powerful social movements have always been accompanied by rich turns in our cultural conversations. Great art makes radical statements about society and makes space for new types of productive labor.

At the same time, these efforts cannot be in the form of reactive criticism. Simply looking down on portions of the black community by using culture to create social distance will only reify the class distinctions that imprison us all. As the black creative class reaches its maturity, it will have to use its cultural capital to again stretch our larger cultural imagination. In writing about the often unseen struggles that occur in black history, Bernice Johnson Reagon stated, “Waves go out. When they come in there is always a rock-back. It is not the same wave in the same place and the sands have shifted to never again be the same.” We are all part of larger, longer series of interconnected struggles. And, while the fruits of creative labor do not always correlate to immediate change, the sands are slowly shifting.

33 comments:

Melissa Olson said...

just love the mohawk.

ACO said...

So I realllly enjoy this brief piece. Particularly as I live in probably the capital of the Black Creative Class (Brooklyn) and am constantly thinking through #3.

How do we "stretch out cultural imagination" while keeping in mind accessibility/avoiding cultural elitism? By definition, radical anything is on the margins yet radical organizations, collectives, and movements have altered the public sphere, even if we don't acknowledge these connections (thinking BPP Free Breakfast programs/free health clinics and the state's subsequent adoption of similar programs in schools and poor communities). Anyway, this piece just got me thinking about the rampant class/cultural elitism within the Black community and how on certain matters we need to work to bridge these gaps in order to get stuff (socio-political-economic type stuff) done.

Btw, really liking Rob Bland's pieces. Excellent addition to The Liberator community.

joseph edwards said...

Epic article. Imagine if there was actually a purpose behind the "movement." Another sign of this group seems to be disaffection and cynicism

Terrence said...

My wife and I saw Richard Florida in Austin. Well timed article. Lucky for us we have open forms to have discussions like this.

southeastslim said...

@ACO thank you for the reading and providing some positive feedback

To your question, "how do we stretch out cultural imagination while keeping in mind accessibility and avoiding cultural imagination" I would say that culture is the critical component. I think because the black middle class is so large and so inchoate, most efforts to practice a strictly class-based elitism fall apart. I don't have empirical data in front of me, but I would venture to say that most black folks who have attained some of the material markers of middle/upper-middle class status in America have done so in the last generation or two.

As far as culture and cultural elitism, I actually don't think all forms of cultural elitism are bad. It's problematic when you fetishize the practice of certain habits or the consumption of certain goods and in turn that claims that you are culturally different. On the other hand, pushing an art form or culture to new heights through virtuosity and fierce aesthetic criticism signals that a cultural movement is vibrant and healty.

Your reference to the BPP is really helpful and instructive. Radical movements can definitely move the larger political discourse even when they are on the margins. I think a lot about "Night Catches US" and how they portray the legacy of the panthers and how vision of black activism intersects with later social and cultural movements. In a lot of ways those efforts get lost in the seventies but some of the vestiges of their work remain. It's a tough question.

southeastslim said...

@joseph edwards

I'm not sure if the movement lacks purpose, or if the purpose is simply to diffuse and inchoate to emerge as a cogent political philosophy.

I think a lot about Kanye's Katrina moment here. On the one hand, he goes off the script on a national televised broadcast and starts talking about race+class as it relates to injustice. None of our major public figures were doing that in our political discourse then (and almost no one is doing that now). At the same time, it was basically an incoherent mess and he has completely backed away from that type political vision other than an occasional "I know the government's administering AIDS" type of verse.

All that to say, I think we are at a proto-political stage in this cultural movement. As the BCC develops a stronger class consciousness, certain issues (prison-industrial complex, middle class wages, education,...) will have to be addressed. I have faith in some sort of change occurring in our lifetime.

@terrance
I read a lot of his stuff at the Atlantic. He makes some really interesting points but it seems as though race is often absent from his analysis.

southeastslim said...

for folks who are interested, here is where I got the statistics on black middle class wealth.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/31/business/economy/31memphis.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1296310080-1/E44zovoEB4UPWTOJWfWA

http://www.alternet.org/economy/148068/how_ruthless_banks_gutted_the_black_middle_class_and_got_away_with_it/

Alycia Janifer said...

Is this just a continuation of the divide that has always existed in the Black community though? I completely relate to the "black creative class" but then sometimes I don't because of what I can only describe as classism. I remember back in November a group of Harvard alumni experienced terrible prejudice at a club in Boston. The tone of the letter written from the group's leader was utter shock combined with a tone of "how could anyone think I was like those other uneducated Black people? I went to Harvard!" (http://jezebel.com/5696308/club-mistakes-black-harvard-crowd-for-local-gangbangers) It's like the Black creative class rejects the idea that we live in a post-racial society, but still thinks that race relations have changed enough that every non-Black person in the US would be able to discern the difference between the various classes in the Black community.

There has been a Black Elite in the US for generations, most Black people who has lived in an region with a large Black middle class notice this. They've always been good at patting themselves on the back for their educational and career accomplishments, and not very good at relating to Blacks who don't have a college education or don't have the right credentials. Maybe this creative class isn't a new thing, but a new generation of the Black Middle and Upper Class that has always been there.

ACO said...

@Alycia Janifer

but i don't think "black creative class" and "black elite" are the same thing. I think there is a difference from identifying with being a Black artist vs. Jack and Jill (the Harvard students barred from the party), right?


I guess this also may speak to the "large and inchoate" nature of the Black middle class then?

And I guess this may also raise the question about "black creative class[es]" of the past? How do we contextualize this current experience/phenomenon within the history of Black urban artistry--BAM and Harlem Renaissance etc etc. Suburban move back to the city vs. great migration...

MrRocking said...

You can be conscious, you can be street. But never be elite.

southeastslim said...

@Alycia

I think Amaka gets at some of the tensions b/w the traditional black elite and the bcc but let me add a couple of other really good points that you made.

1) At this point in history, the middle-class is more accessible than it has ever been. Where going to college would have been a really big deal of folks in our parents and grandparents generation, we have seen a tremendous expansion of the number of colleges and the institutions willing to provide loans to go to college. While there is still a tremendous problem in the black community in providing an opportunity for everyone to go, it seems as though there is a college for everyone at this point. If you graduate from high school, there is a college that will accept you and I define a college education as having access to some variation of the middle-class

With that said, simply being middle-class provides fewer economic and cultural benefits than it did 20-or 30 years ago. Wages have stagnated, jobs are harder to come by; most of us are walking around with 4 or 5 digit debt (from college, credit cards, car payments).

The tension that I tried to get at in the third paragraph was a way to try to articulate both the differences within the current black middle class and the difference between Florida's creative class and the bcc.

Unlike the predominately white creative class, we don't have the same generational wealth or access to white privilege; we don't have the power as a collective to gentrify a neighborhood or completely change the cultural dynamics of urban spaces.

All that to say I think you're exactly right in saying there is a sort of elitism at work. I would put it more in the category of cultural elitism and not so much social or economic elitism. It's not so much Our Kind of People as it's hating on ideas and institutions (a lot of them traditionally black middle class) that seem to be fixed in essential notions of blackness. When you see bcc folks critiquing the black church, patriarchy, black greek organizations, black nationalism and tyler perry they're often turning against institutions that they grew up in or are intimately familiar with.

The class component here also implicitly revolves around access to some sort of cultural capital that is a pretty big deal and I need to spend more time thinking through.

achali said...

I think it helps if we include the "black creative lower class" into the discussion about the "black creative middle class" and "black creative upper class".

In my experience and reading of history, the "black creative upper class" is usually just the "black upper class" -- they are rarely creative and tend to enter the political race discussion when convenient (i.e. when victims of petty harrassment).

The "black creative middle class" tends to be informed or influenced by the "black creative lower class" -- the creative kids from the actual ghettos (think hip-hop) who the middle class suburban kids come into contact with through various social spaces like church, summer camp, and schools with mixed populations thanks to magnet programs and busing services. They usually get their minds freed through such encounters and either form kinship ties that are permanent or attain a measure of success and abandon their lower class folk.

This is an important point when we talk about radicalizing or politicizing the black creative middle class... whether through study (DuBois) or kinship, it's the maintenance of a connection with the lower/working class reality that keeps middle class folks politicized (i.e. In touch with reality). Disconnect them and they get disconnected.

At my HBCU alma mater I arrived thinking I was going to find a mass of black creative lower class folks like me all there to steal away with knowledge and bring it back to their respective ghettos to foment revolution {see: "What is a Janitor?"}. Instead I encountered the black middle class and realized how much of an anomaly I was and have been trying to navigate the line between them and my kinfolk back home (and in the new working class black communities I've made kinship bonds in since) ever since.

To that point, a lot of the black creative middle class who live in Brooklyn do not connect with the historically working class communities here and certainly do not form kinship ties. Ask those working class Brooklynites about it and they'll be straight up about it. A common perception in conversations I've had is that most of the black creative middle class is only in NYC as cultural colonizers there to steal the keys to their personal creative dreams and bounce. And my experience in Brooklyn has confirmed that to a large extent. Working in education and with impoverished kids is one thing, but making lifelong kinship ties with working class black Brooklynites, their parents, families and their histories -- becoming family -- is another. The saving grass of the black creative middle class is, and always has been, accepting that the black creative working class is the true catalyst for change -- then they can get over their narcissism and listen more.

drniaimani said...

In this piece, you touch on many great points for critical thought & discussion on understanding & seeing the Black Creative Class. Particularly when you say, "...I think having these trends reinforced on a weekly basis has been critical for how the black creative class sees the world", left me to think-how the black creative class believes the world sees them.

Through these trends permission was given to Blacks to be creative & challenge the norms, to have individuality & an identity that makes you proud. This concept is not unlike the push from James Brown to be "Black & Proud" however it had to be done in what is perceived as in "decency & in order." The difficulty has been the larger community recognizing that cultural differences within a culture is what gives us our uniqueness & self-preservation as a race of people.

Yet at the same time, when the BCC seems to be too far to the left & not particularly what Blacks want to be represented or reflective as...distance within the group continues to emerge. The evolution/rise of BCC is born out of the Black communities' ability to survive & thrive on the margins of society. To disconnect, disown, separate, or diminish the role & contribution of any of the black classes through elitism is only another strategic way to keep us divided as a black race.

Great work...glad to call you FAM ;-)

BLAXIDERMY said...

"you know you're a black child who was born in the 80's if...."

I kind of see where you're going with this, but it would be helpful if your "Black Creative Class" were better-defined. Or, if you acknowledged the actual (Blacks of the) creative class. Conflating an educated, media-savvy black youth with the actual creative class neuters the nuances of each one. And throwing hipsters (yet suburbanites) into the mix doesn't help.

Nice to see you situate your personal experience within some cultural context in this forum, but I'm hearing an attraction to "the idea" of the creative class mixing with the name-dropping from your list of cultural influencers.

Let's not forget that every generation has had a pop culture that speaks to them/influences them... Even in this interactive age, consuming media that targets you and your experience WELL doesn't put you at the forefront of that culture. It means that the actual creative class is doing a damned good job marketing to you. Easy target.
-pcc

Peoples Rodriguez said...

any one that shows "...Oscar Wao" gets love!

dope piece that is so on..

I would take it a step further to say that the Black Creative Class is what drives the creative class period! Most of the art and culture consumed and mimicked by the Creative class comes from people of color...

joseph edwards said...

Fair point, southeastslim. I think the "movement" is definitely diffuse and confused (at times). Like Kanye's moment, as you pointed out, or Mos Def's appearances on Bill Maher. There's a sense of a lack of social justice but the conversation isn't always as informed as it could be.

I don't know if the BCC will ever have concrete goals (it would be nice...). I still see strength in images of the BCC spreading, though. It creates a new stereotype to counter the dominant one about blacks. And like most stereotypes it will have elements of truth and be used for ill. But if the stereotype of us becomes cosby-show loving, nerds with a love/hate relationship with Tyler Perry, I'm cool with that. Ideas like the BCC counter the dominate narrative about our race (low-achieving, poor, helpless, chronically bad in school, etc) that is told over and over again.

Mdotwrites said...

Aye Blood. I shouted you out in my post, "The Politics of Making a 'Black Film' in Obama's America." http://bit.ly/e21wtv

AND.

I see you with this here:
"Bernice Johnson Reagon stated, “Waves go out. When they come in there is always a rock-back. It is not the same wave in the same place and the sands have shifted to never again be the same.” We are all part of larger, longer series of interconnected struggles. And, while the fruits of creative labor do not always correlate to immediate change, the sands are slowly shifting."<<<< #Fall2010isms.

Ms.Pierre said...

I have to say I agree with Joseph Edwards. We are a class that is contantly thinking and looking forward to the next new thing but we do not look to change or have an affect. I say we because I believe that the vreative class is a generational thing...and I consider myself an active member

Candace said...

I thought I might be part of this group, but since Kanye's music became big after my college career, I assume I am older than the "creative class". My question is: do people in this group fit into an age bracket?

ilPrincipe said...

I wouldn't know where to begin to comment. My personal experience, background and opinions span literally all the bounds the writer and subsequent commentators place around the groups named in the article, from the ethnic to the professional. I'm even the product of a historic elite of colour. Sometimes, I think that designation makes me pariah among those who levy criticism against the African American middle- and upper-class establishment for NOT being poor, for having been born into an educated family or having had access to privilege associated principally with the dominant culture (through the life-long work of people like my ancestors who marched, built schools, and changed laws for all of African America). However, as a member of the creative class, I think that those like me are consequently able to negotiate the spaces between those boundaries, and be the bridges over which culturally-specific issues can cross into mainstream media, and affect discussion in the public sphere, without necessarily making of those issues media cash cows (see hip-hop) or blanching them of their colour (which, IMHO, was Kanye's point). At the same time, I believe that it is the mission of this black creative class to champion those causes that further the goals of African America in ways that are effective and positive but that do not cost us 200+ years of struggle and sacrifice (again, my brothers and sisters, see hip-hop...please!). Like another poster here, though, I am likely older than those who opine more vociferously on the article. Their very well-informed and articulate comments certainly open my eyes to some aspects of cultural realities (like change in Brooklyn, which I've watched from Manhattan for some years now) that affect all of the creative class. There is great power in that creative influence, and that power should be judiciously used to make the biggest, most positive splash possible--creating a new temporary pattern in the sand, and thereby changing the way the waves come and go everywhere. After all, only the sand and waves are permanent; the changes in their forms are the substance of history.

achali said...

A shorter, quieter, way of articulating my previous thoughts might be: To have a conversation about a classless creative community assumes the not yet created idea(l?) of a classless creative community. Step one is for us all to admit that this is in fact not reality, because the only way such a community can be achieved -- and thus a conversation within that community be real -- is by first acknowledging our class status, and then working together as diplomatic members of classes to dismantle class divides.

Philosophically, the creative under classes have the best access to uncompromisable integrity... Like an innocent newborn or one who has nothing has nothing yet to loose, it both gifts one with the ability to access raw/"pure" integrity, and curses one with unlimited temptation. This is why I believe those who have not, and children, are the most blessed on this Earth -- but because they are full of unfathomable (because things that are not yet manifest are unmeasurable and therefore appear infinite) potential energy (unlike perfectly observable kinetic energy) they are also the most attacked with temptation.

Certainly, creative upper classes have important and vital roles to play and amazing contributions to make, but -- and here I'll keep the same words I used before -- the saving grace of the black creative middle [& upper] class is, and always has been, accepting that the black creative working [lower] class is the true catalyst for change, then they can get over their narcissism and listen more. It's why Michael Jackson said listen to the children; it's why Old Dirty Bastard announced that Wu-Tang is, at it's foundation, for the children; it's why George Clinton said that whatever kind of music that is getting the most hate (oppression) is exactly what I'm gonna listen to. That's wisdom that's been given freely to people in all classes.

ambrose said...

@malissa Olson: yes the mohawk is bomb!

@ the author: I aspire to some day be as cunning, and thorough as you in my writing about ideas that most people simply wouldn't understand. This is a beautiful explanation of the Black Creative Class. As a member of this class, I can truly say that you have done a wonderful job of portraying us as a whole. Thank you for your hard work and diligence in creating a beautiful piece of literary art WITH A PURPOSE! However, i find it increasingly difficult to associate with people who don't think in the same way that I do. The more frustrating piece of that fact is knowing that most of the people are people who I "should" identify with. Young, Black, etc. seem to be a lacking motivation and a true since of self. They fight diligently to fit into cookie cutter molds of "the black teen." Where does this madness end? THE BLACK CREATIVE CLASS! WE ARE A NARROW YET VOCAL CLASS. I AM HAPPY TO BE ALIVE IN THE TIME OF THIS DEVELOPMENT IN BLACK HISTORY!

hurray kanye, boo tyler! lol

Melissa Olson said...

@ambrose... um (Melissa)
Okay.... so, yeah, the reason why I think the mohawk is ironic has to do with the piece here on the liberator about how wigs are made from the hair sold by Peruvian women and Indian women to make weaves. The Mohawk on the other hand is that iconic symbol of rock and roll borrowed from the counterculture to symbolize freedom, among other things. So, J Davy's front woman can rock a Mohawk without comment, along with the rest of the rock world, and that's somehow cool. Not even in this instance, when its the hair on a person's head, do people pay homage to indigenous forms of being. I mean I guess a person has got to rock a lace front weave before its acceptable to comment.

Blackyoda said...

Enjoyed the article as well as the subsequent comments.

achali said...

If anywhere, here's an acceptable place to comment on the mohawk. The irony of the mohawk's pop-appropriation, and subsequent suppression of contextual comment and historical engagement, is almost enough to make one cynical. Realizing that the current moment we're in is in fact one in which the mere visual representation (avatar) of "something that reminds me of something" substitutes for an actual intimate knowing might, too, be enough to make one cynical. Personally, after a long day like today, I'm about to go finish reading this essay on Television's degenerate effects on the American mind Calimike posted a while back, go meditate on the roof, have a cup of tea, and get to bed -- cause tomorrow's another long day. It would be nice to see a liberator interview with J Davey in which the mohawk question is seriously engaged though. If anywhere, here is where I can see that becoming an actual reality if one really wanted to directly engage them with the question.

Melissa Olson said...

But, the hair question is only cynical from where you sit. Because I see it differently. The "Mohawk" is not some long dead thing... it is an appropriation. You might not see young native men wearing Mohawks very often today, but its symbolically there.... wearing a head-roach (a garment that looks like a mohawk) is something that young men, and sometimes older men, do. So, it seems the appropriation of the mohawk as a symbol of freedom is one that focuses on the image of young men. And the lace front weave... long hair as the symbol of femininity. Femininity as much as whiteness. From the standpoint of Indigenous women... it's probably good to remember that white women imitate their idea of "Indian" women when they want to express their desire for expressing desire. Look up at the recent hipster fad of white women wearing headdresses. (Again with the male images). So maybe buying a lace front weave is a desire for more femininity as much as it is about a symbol of repression. But, it should be worth commenting, that often, white women want to look like Pocahontas.... etc. I always read the misappropriation of the Indian maiden thing as a desire for sexual freedom. I understand perfectly well that for black women not conforming to standards of beauty would be an act of liberation, or going beyond all notions of hair and skin and whateverelse might be greater. What I am getting at is that the use of hair for lacefronts isn't interrogated throroughly either. Maybe its as simply as saying that white women and black women are often misappropriating, through symbol and material, indigenous beauty for the sake of expressing a desire for sexual freedom.... or something like that.

Melissa Olson said...

BTW you should be heartened to know Achali, Florida doesn't particularly consider MPLS on the map either when writing about the creative class. In his view of the Unites States, the greater the moral/social capital accumulated in one place, the less likely it is to attract members of the creative class. Florida quotes Putnam (Bowling Alone) in service of this very fact where it concerns MPLS-St. Paul. For Florida, social capital requires "strong ties" between community members ie. people in MPLS go bowling together, invite each other over for cards etc. The creative class is attracted by places where finding a job relies on "loose ties". Places like Denver, Houston, LA etc. Florida's conception doesn't work especially well for communities of color historically situated or rooted in a specific place, in fact, he argues those cities are less likely to attract business. Florida, though, only has lays claim to one version of the "creative class". What I find really sorta ironic is that the "Super Creative" class as you call it is probably a generation removed from what Florida calls the creative class. In other words, its the "Super Creative class" that creates the break through on which the creative class thrives, as they sell the products on which the "super" or "supra" creative class consumes. Actually, right now, I don't even believe most of these places are inside the physical boundaries of the United States. Better to watch carefully, as the United States cultural borders continue to push into new places worldwide.

Sean_Jacobs said...

I assume you have seen the branding of a "New Black":

http://bit.ly/fOCfPo

Sean_Jacobs said...

Assuming you're following the "New Black" discourse: http://bit.ly/fOCfPo

Patti P said...

As you already know Rob, I LOVE this article! Hardly anyone has publicly addressed the black hipsters or rather black creatives and their culture influence and relevancy. You touched on a plethora of significant topics, my favorite being the amount of power that middle class black young people--including the artists and creatives--have to definitively influence and ultimately change the world, politically, socially, economically and more. Keep writing articles like this and when you're free from your Ph.D ;) come contribute a piece for XHIBIT P!!! ~Much love

Check out the new XHIBIT P exhibition on hipsters, where we discuss Black Hipsters, gentrification, generational gaps, fashion, and social discourse and MORE!: WWW.XHIBITP.COM

NubianEmpress said...

Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaas! *shakes my dreads at the computer screen*

esp. loving the J*Davey photo

Ezir'ra (Ta ziyah) said...

Maybe we were the proletariats marx's spoke of during the 'socialists' movement. the industrious middle class that created a balance between the government and its people [social contract]. Only then, there wasn't a pronounced method to politicize our creative ideologies. Now we have Hip Hop, Contemporary Art, Global fashion, etc. that shout our political culture.

Our revolution was television, literally. Media was our way of expressing either free speech, or speech with a political cost [Chuck D and Professor Griff/Khalid Muhammad].

Laura Turner-Essel said...

Wow, you just described my life. Thanks for the article!

Post a Comment